News

The Philippines' Flood Control Budget Crisis: A P556 Billion Question with Devastating Results

Despite allocating over ₱556 billion since 2022, the Philippines remains critically unprepared for floods. This investigation uncovers why one of the world’s highest flood control budgets still fails to protect millions.

John Soriano

22 Jul 2025 — 9 min read

“Why Do We Let Them Get Away With This.” A stylized depiction of neglect in flood-stricken Filipino communities. Image generated by ChatGPT using DALL·E

The Philippines has allocated over ₱556 billion for flood control programs since 2022 under the current administration alone, yet the nation continues to face catastrophic flooding that devastates millions of lives. Despite being among the world's highest spenders on flood mitigation—approximately ₱1 billion per day—recent typhoons have exposed critical gaps in both budget utilization and project effectiveness that demand immediate accountability.

Philippine Flood Control Budget vs. Utilization Rates (2020-2025)

Massive Budget Increases Meet Poor Implementation

The Department of Public Works and Highways' (DPWH) flood control budget has experienced an extraordinary 171% increase from ₱90 billion in 2020 to ₱244 billion in 2024. The 2025 allocation has been set at ₱303 billion, representing nearly 34% of DPWH's total budget. However, this dramatic budget growth masks a concerning trend of declining efficiency and utilization.

Budget utilization rates have plummeted alarmingly: from 73% in 2022 to just 58% in 2023. Over the past five years, the funds allocated to flood management have consistently comprised about 20-25% of DPWH's entire annual budget, yet the country remains "profoundly ill-prepared" to face typhoons and flooding.

The Human Cost of Failed Flood Control

Recent typhoons have painted a devastating picture of the consequences of inadequate flood management. In 2024 alone, over 15 million people were affected across 17 regions, with more than 160 deaths, 135 injured, and 21 missing. The economic damage reached PHP 21 billion (US$367 million).

Typhoon Carina in July 2024 caused 6.2 million people to be affected, with 48 deaths and economic losses exceeding PHP 4 billion. The successive typhoons from October to November 2024—including Kristine, Leon, Marce, Nika, Ofel, and Pepito—displaced over 700,000 individuals at peak and caused damages worth PHP 21 billion.

Accountability Failures and Audit Concerns

The Commission on Audit (COA) has repeatedly flagged serious implementation failures. In its 2023 report on the Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA), COA found that 22 of 58 flood control projects worth ₱510.58 million were not completed on time, with delays ranging from one day to 310 days. Additionally, 29 projects worth ₱371.03 million were never implemented due to cancellations and procurement failures.

These delays have cost the government ₱32.9 million in commitment fees from 2018 to 2023. COA attributed the problems to "poor strategies in monitoring and implementation of programs and projects" and "inadequacy of strategies to strictly implement planned programs".

The audit findings reveal systemic issues beyond MMDA. COA has flagged DPWH for delays and non-completion of ₱216 billion worth of infrastructure projects in 2023, including flood control initiatives, citing "poor project monitoring and execution".

Examples of Successful Local Implementation

Despite systemic failures at the national level, several local government units have demonstrated effective flood control management:

Marikina City stands out as a success story in disaster preparedness. Following devastating floods from Typhoon Ondoy in 2009, which killed 35 people, Marikina implemented comprehensive reforms through its "Save the Marikina River" program. The city achieved zero deaths during the August 2012 Habagat flooding that severely affected Metro Manila, credited to Project NOAH's early warning system and improved preparedness.

Marikina's approach included:

River rehabilitation and clearing of informal settlements
Construction of 94 kilometers of major flood control and drainage systems
Implementation of advanced early warning systems
Community-based disaster preparedness programs

The city's Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council was recognized as one of the National Capital Region's best, ranking second to Pasig City.

Iloilo Province has also demonstrated effective flood management through the ₱4.3 billion Iloilo Flood Control Project, completed between 1999-2011. The project included:

Construction of the 4.75-kilometer Jaro Floodway
Improvement of Tigum and Aganan Rivers
Strategic flood control structures protecting agricultural and commercial areas

Research has shown the Iloilo Flood Control Project as "one of the programs that advocates successful partnerships between governments, institutions and communities". The project has effectively reduced flood risks in previously vulnerable areas and contributed to regional economic development.

Presidential Budget Cuts and Accountability Measures

In a significant move, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. vetoed ₱16.7 billion worth of flood control projects in the 2025 national budget. The largest cuts were made to:

Region 3: ₱7 billion
Region 5: ₱2.73 billion
National Capital Region: ₱1.75 billion

These vetoes, totaling ₱26 billion from DPWH projects, were deemed "inconsistent with the administration's priority programs". The cuts raise questions about project quality and alignment with actual flood mitigation needs.

Systemic Issues Requiring Reform

The research reveals several critical problems requiring immediate attention:

Poor Budget Planning and Monitoring: COA audits consistently find inadequate planning, delayed procurement, and insufficient project supervision across agencies.

Unclear Jurisdictional Responsibilities: Senator Loren Legarda highlighted "perennial problems with the mandate between DPWH and MMDA," calling for clear delineation of tasks to prevent public suffering.

Insufficient Coordination: Despite billions in allocation, there's poor coordination between national agencies and local government units, resulting in duplicated efforts and gaps in coverage.

Limited Accountability Mechanisms: While budget allocations continue increasing, there are insufficient mechanisms to ensure funds translate into effective flood protection.

The Path Forward

The contrast between national-level budget mismanagement and successful local implementations like Marikina and Iloilo demonstrates that effective flood control is achievable with proper governance, community engagement, and accountability.

Senate President Francis Escudero's call for accountability in budget deliberations represents a crucial step toward reform. As he noted, "Smart spending has a bias for durable projects, not adhocracy or band-aid solutions that are seasonal in nature. We should build for the next generation, not for the next elections".

The Philippines' flood control crisis is not fundamentally about budget size—it's about governance, accountability, and implementation effectiveness. With proper oversight, clear jurisdictional responsibilities, and lessons learned from successful local programs, the nation's massive flood control investments could finally deliver the protection that millions of vulnerable Filipinos desperately need.

The time for accountability is now. Every day of delay means more lives at risk and more taxpayer money wasted while communities remain defenseless against increasingly severe climate impacts.

References